Dear Grinca, it's only because of your desperate cry contained in the question title ("please answer even it is outside of your expertise i badly need an answer") that I do answer your question.
There is no legitimate logical process that fits your description. However there are a host of informal fallacies that might fit the bill: 1. Equivocation: using a term in more than one sense. Clever
Dear Zarra, if you approach your questions in a simplistic way, your first and third questions, and the first half of the second question have one simple answer: Yes. The second part of the second question
Dear Tanya, the question you are asking youself is a pertinent question that has been raised by hundreds of philosophers from all countries of the world so far, and many of them tried to answer them