You are here:
LAN (hubs, switches, design, topology, trouble-shooting, etc) WAN (WAN Optimization, QoS / Bandwidth Management, Design, Bandwidth, Trouble-shooting, etc) INTERNET (firewall, QoS / Bandwidth Management, Routers, trouble-shooting, etc)
Over 20 years in computers and networking. Strong, broad-based expertise from years in Operations and Sales Engineering at major corporations and hardware vendors.
B.A., various courses in computers and networking as well as many many years of OJT (on the job training) and real-world experience.
| User | Date | K | C | P | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| am | 05/17/12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Faraz | 04/26/12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | oh Thanks. |
| Ahmad | 03/29/12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Actually i tried all of these methods ..... |
| Hamid Reza | 03/17/12 | 9 | 8 | 10 | |
| Andrew | 03/13/12 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Hi Trevor, Sorry to hear about this but these things do happen. It does seem that the root cause is likely the router, since all the wireless devices lose connnectivity together or nearly so.
Hi AM, Yes it is possible for a port on a switch to "go bad". It isn't as common as it used to be but it still does happen. There is no special tool needed - just a bit of logic and troubleshooting
Hi Tom, Thanks for all the details. It looks like you'll need to configure your firewall accordingly to allow those inbound connections and translate them to the internal resource. This is typically
Hi Faraz, Basically yes, but you are mixing up your initial question with other things. So, let's say that you create a single network like so: 10.1.1.0/24 (the /24 means a subnet mask of 255.255
Hi Bob, I can appreciate your position on this matter. Truly, I do. I am also sorry if you were offended by my response to this one individual. I do hope that my response shocked him into getting
Answers by Expert:

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.