Astronomy/Expert Profile

Average Ratings

• Knowledgeability 9.85
• Clarity of Response 9.90
• Timeliness 9.90
• Politeness 9.98

• Number of Questions (in Past 24 Hours) 0
• Max Questions to be Asked (in 24 Hour Period) 15
• Total Questions (since joining AllExperts) 645
• Volunteer Since 2000-10-22
• Prestige Points 13246

Recent Reviews from Users

Read More Comments

    K = Knowledgeability    C = Clarity of Response    T = Timeliness    P = Politeness

User	Date	K	C	T	P	Comments
ernie	10/09/09	10	10	10	10	Hi Paul, thanks again for your answer .....
joe	09/15/09	10	10	10	10	Thanks alot , i seen the four moons .....
Tom	08/08/09	10	10	10	10	Well, I guess that takes care of .....
dennis	07/30/09	10	10	10	10	thank you for your help paul just .....
Randy	03/24/09	10	10	10	10	Thank you. This gives me some useful .....

Recent Answers from Paul Wagner

2009-11-03 Meade 290-C focuser:

HI Tom You might find this article interesting---it's about this type of scope, and what serious amateurs do to make them better. With about 40X, you can certainly see the rings of Saturn! http://www

2009-10-29 built-in barlow:

Hi Randy the short answer here is that if the scope was designed to incorporate this Barlow into its focal system, then it probably works best that way. But if you are a dedicated fiddler like I am

2009-10-28 Meade 290-C focuser:

Hi Tom I am not surprised that you didn't get much help from customer service! But I want to ask a question. Are you missing the focuser (the mechanical part that moves the eyepiece in and out of

2009-10-23 Astronomy and "global warming":

HI Matt It's hard to say how climate change would affect the recreational astronomer. Maybe there would be more cloudy days, or fewer, but in general, the skies are about the same, independent of the

2009-10-18 4.5 or 5 inch newtonian reflector:

Hi Randy There is little difference between these scopes---except that the 5 inch wll gather a bit more light. I am a little confused by your comparison, because the 4.5, with a 900mm focal length