You are here:

Peoplesoft/Expert Profile


Ask A Question

Expertise

I am willing to share my know how gained from 15 years of supporting PeopleSoft payroll and related modules. I do not have access to an installed system at this time, so my knowledge will be from memory and analysis of provided facts

Experience in the area

PeopleSoft Payroll -- development and support PeopleSoft Payroll Interface -- development and support PeopleSoft Benefits Administration -- support PeopleSoft COBOL -- Functional expert/programmer

Education/Credentials

BA Mathematics, PeopleSoft employee 1993 to 2004

Average Ratings

Recent Reviews from Users

Read More Comments

    K = Knowledgeability    C = Clarity of Response    T = Timeliness    P = Politeness
UserDateKCTPComments
Sue11/13/0910101010Thanks again - you lead me in .....
Randy09/28/0910101010Thank you very much for the quick .....
Jagadeesh06/11/09101010 
Daisy04/17/0910101010Thank You very much
Amy04/15/0910101010 

Recent Answers from Matthew Bowden

2009-11-19 NA payrolll query:

Yes, paycheck reversal occurs after confirmation. That is its specific role. You cannot reverse a check that has not been confirmed as it will not have a check number assigned. The reversal process

2009-11-13 page_num 9999 max , line_num 99 max:

I think those pages should be deleted. Check to see if the corresponding entries in PS_PAY_LINE are deleted for the 'old' page numbers. I think I reported this bug at one time. On a recalc all the 'C'

2009-11-13 page_num 9999 max , line_num 99 max:

The Single Check feature is certainly a factor. Each combined check is creating a new page number. To get a high level picture of what is happening look at the results of the following SQL both before

2009-11-12 page_num 9999 max , line_num 99 max:

I have never found it to be a true issue of needing a larger maximum. The error is triggered because of an undetected processing problem or manual entry of page numbers near the maximum. During the

2009-11-03 PeopleSoft Person Data / JOB Data:

Vishal Not my area of expertise, but I offer a line of thought. The creation of PERSON_DATA is valid for more that just employees, so it should not require creation of a position. If that is happening

 

Ask A Question

All Answers

Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.