You are here:
I specialize in the areas of scientific materialism and consciousness described as a materialist epiphenomenon. Also can answer questions pertaining to general atheism, atheist-agnostic differences etc.
I have been an atheist for over 27 yrs. and have written two books on the subject: 'The Atheist's Handbook to Modern Materialism'(2000), and 'Atheism" A Beginner's Handbook' (due out next month).
Intertel, American Atheists, American Mathematical Society, American Astronomical Society, American Geophysical Union
Atheist articles: 'The American Atheist' magazine, assorted U.S. newspapers (e.g. Baltimore Sun); two books (already mentioned in experience section); papers-articles published in Intertel's Journal: Integra.
Master of Philosophy in Physics. Also took more than 3 yrs. of theology and metaphysics courses at a Catholic University (1964-67) - before I became an atheist. Thus, I have much more religious familiarity & background than many atheists.
Writers' Digest Award for the essay 'The Atheist in America' (2000), Government of Barbados research in solar physics award (1980-84), AAS Solar Physics Award (1984)
Atheism-materialism is a useful subject to provide an antidote for so much of the religious nonsense that abounds today. The trick is to get people to listen, to read - or at least ask questions!
I want to see how much more of human consciousness can be accounted for in the physicalist setting, once we proceed further into quantum field theory. I believe that QFT, not ancient theological doctrines, will have the final say.
There are many prominent atheists out there. People don't know about them, usually until they die. Such atheists have included: Katherine Hepburn, Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov. Einstein himself was an "agnostic atheist".
In a recent opinion poll, 52% of Americans said they would not vote for a "well-qualified" atheist, if one were to run for public office.
| User | Date | K | C | T | P | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert | 11/24/08 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| amesha | 04/22/08 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Amesha | 04/18/08 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Dan | 10/25/07 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| sunil mahabir | 07/05/07 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Hello, May I say, Thomas, that I certainly enjoyed reading your 'Summa Theologica'? On a serious note, it is good to have a questioner who has seriously reviewed previous answers given to questions
Hello, Science is firmly committed to predictions, since their confirmation is ultimately what validates a theory (say that is tested against another theory). So, predictions are part and parcel of
Hello, Unfortunately, based on my own experience, religious arguments and debates - especially with parents - are never particularly fruitful, or useful. Because there is so much emotional investment
Hello, First, no one claims (at least I do not) that one can "scientifically prove" there is no God. In effect, this is tantamount ot proving a negative, which is logically impossible. What I say
Hello, In a way, it's not too puzzling as to why believers behave as they do. (Certainly in regard to their reactions to non-believers). I believe at root this is a reflection of a fundamental insecurity
Answers by Expert:

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.