I can answer questions about point and shoots and 35mm SLR`s from the 1960s to present. I can also handle most questions on digital cameras from "camera" makers, like Nikon, Olympus, Canon, Sony, etc. Though usually I`m not too familiar with the driver interface, as 3rd party devices for download are more efficient. Sorry, but I can no longer answer questions about the value of old cameras.
I'm an "expert" under photography. I've many years experience in photo retail.John and Chris
Genuine AllExperts Expert
http://www.allexperts.com/displayExpert.asp?Expert=9938
IDIG (internet digital imaging group)
| User | Date | K | C | P | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gerry | 11/25/10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | I never thought od the same camera ..... |
| anthony | 11/22/10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Michael | 11/21/10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | You understood what I was asking, were ..... |
| anthony | 11/20/10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| rom | 11/10/09 | 10 | 10 | 10 | good advice...helpul |
Neither the t1 or t2 are professional cameras. And more importantly, the lenses that come in the kits are not professional lenses. Having said that, either camera has enough resolution to make a
Well, the only reason to go with the Olympus is if you really want the big zoom. As for 3500 vs. 40000.... the 4000 has lower signal noise (grain) at high ISO (film speed)... good for low light. Low
Michael, The problem here is that sometimes you are shooting out of the performance envelope of P/S cameras. School auditoriums for example.... a very hard thing to photograph well, even with an
You can take good photos with the SP800UZ inside. But you could take better ones with the SD4000. You must be careful how much zoom you use when in low light with the Olympus. There isn't that much
I'm always quick to suggest a DSLR. The picture quality is just so much better. Portable?? Well, they still don't make an SLR that will fit in your pocket.... but there are two notably small SLR cameras

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.