You are here:

Auto Insurance Claims/Rob Painter, Ase, CFEI, CAFATE

To Profile Page

All Reviews from Users

    Column Headings:

      K = Knowledgeability    C = Clarity of Response    T = Timeliness    P = Politeness
      N = Nominated for Expert of the Month

DateUserKCTPNComments
2009-11-20wes10101010NoThanks very much.. I will tell them all details.
2009-11-10Sylvia10101010Nothankss!!
2009-11-06Lisa98109No 
2009-11-05ray771010NoApparently, the expert does not know whether the state law of good faith applies to the third carrier or not.
2009-09-16Holly10101010Yes 
2009-07-19John10101010No 
2009-07-01Steve10101010YesRob, Thanks for the time, I figured the medical would be off the top. eems like the medical X 3 is reasonable. But again thanks for your time and help!
2009-06-26Angela10101010NoVery prompt and informative reply.
2009-05-14Jessie10101010YesRob, I believe that you were rated high in all aspect. Your answers were clear and easy to understand. Timeliness was also well. I sent a follow up question and it was answered within hours. Thanks alot Rob.
2009-05-08Shannon10101010Yes 
2009-05-08Nattie10101010NoThank you very much!!1
2009-05-07Janice10101010No 
2009-05-05Gil10101010YesThanks Rob!
2009-05-05Gil9101010Yes 
2009-04-28Toni10101010YesThanks for all your help, Rob. Fortunately for me, my insurance company will give me an OEM part if my car is 2 years old or less (which it is so I will go through them instead).
2009-04-20Kelly10101010YesThanks
2009-03-10jennifer10101010Yesthe response i got back from my inquery was great and fast!!!
2009-02-27Daniel10101010Yes 
2009-02-25Jessica10101010YesThank you for the honesty!!!
2009-02-21LINDA10101010Yes 
2009-02-21enes10101010No 
2009-02-11Natalie10101010YesI am not insured with them.
2009-02-09Flor10101010Yes 
2009-02-08lynn10101010Yesrobs answer to my question was fantastic, personal & speedy. so glad to have found this website and will definetly use it again. thanks rob!!!!!!!!
2009-02-03Andrea10101010YesThanks I will try to reason with the supervisor and thanks for answering so fast!
2009-01-31Atif10101010YesThanks alot, I really appreciate it. Maybe getting it totaled won't be so bad.
2009-01-30John10101010NoYeah, figured that would be the case, just happy I only had to pay the $300. Thank you.
2009-01-24cathy10101010Nothankyou for your response, this will be very helpful, and now she knows where to begin
2009-01-10Marcia10101010YesVery thorough answer that is highly appreciated!
2009-01-09Lin88108Yes 

Page:   1 | 2  |  Next 

 

To Profile Page

All Answers

Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Rob Painter, Ase, CFEI, CAFATE

Expertise

Please remember. I am not an attorney and cannot legal advice. My answers are based on my experience due to litigation I have been involved in as an expert, for both insurance companies and while oposing them opposing them. I deal with only comprehensive claims on autos related to fire and theft. I have even had the opportunity to rewrite policy coverage language as it relates to vehicle theft and forced entry for insurance defense attorneys.

Experience

Experience in the area: Working with insurance companies and attorneys on these issues for over 20 years. It is very common to have a reported stolen car with a so-called factory anti-theft system to have the theft claim denied. I have served successfully as an expert witness in the courts across the US representing the insured and their attorney revealing that the insurance expert did not take all known theories into consideration before rendering their "Forensic" conclusion. Many insurance carriers us independent "Forensic" experts to examine reported stolen vehicles commonly using flawed methodology implicating the innocent insured with the theft. My job is to determine if the insurance expert reached his conclusions based on accepted scientific principals or just net opinion with no basis other than opinion. My case record against such experts is very compelling.My resume can be seen at the catagory "Auto Theft and Prevention." In "Forensics" the scientific method must be employed. In the forensic locksmith field determining how a reported stolen vehicle was last operated, many processes cannot be duplicated and are conveniently not addressed. If they were, juries would have the opportunity to make a fair and impartial opinion at least about what the expert could or could not prove. There is a purported process determining the last key used. The chances of determining such is very rare uless the key is found in the ignition lock. Experts commonly destroy evidence as well and are rarely questioned on this event. I reveal the weakness in their testimony on such instances.

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.