You are here:
K = Knowledgeability C = Clarity of Response T = Timeliness P = Politeness
N = Nominated for Expert of the Month
| Date | User | K | C | T | P | N | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-11-20 | wes | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thanks very much.. I will tell them all details. |
| 2009-11-10 | Sylvia | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | thankss!! |
| 2009-11-06 | Lisa | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | No | |
| 2009-11-05 | ray | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | No | Apparently, the expert does not know whether the state law of good faith applies to the third carrier or not. |
| 2009-09-16 | Holly | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-07-19 | John | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | |
| 2009-07-01 | Steve | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Rob, Thanks for the time, I figured the medical would be off the top. eems like the medical X 3 is reasonable. But again thanks for your time and help! |
| 2009-06-26 | Angela | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Very prompt and informative reply. |
| 2009-05-14 | Jessie | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Rob, I believe that you were rated high in all aspect. Your answers were clear and easy to understand. Timeliness was also well. I sent a follow up question and it was answered within hours. Thanks alot Rob. |
| 2009-05-08 | Shannon | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-05-08 | Nattie | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thank you very much!!1 |
| 2009-05-07 | Janice | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | |
| 2009-05-05 | Gil | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks Rob! |
| 2009-05-05 | Gil | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-04-28 | Toni | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks for all your help, Rob. Fortunately for me, my insurance company will give me an OEM part if my car is 2 years old or less (which it is so I will go through them instead). |
| 2009-04-20 | Kelly | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks |
| 2009-03-10 | jennifer | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | the response i got back from my inquery was great and fast!!! |
| 2009-02-27 | Daniel | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-02-25 | Jessica | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thank you for the honesty!!! |
| 2009-02-21 | LINDA | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-02-21 | enes | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | |
| 2009-02-11 | Natalie | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | I am not insured with them. |
| 2009-02-09 | Flor | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-02-08 | lynn | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | robs answer to my question was fantastic, personal & speedy. so glad to have found this website and will definetly use it again. thanks rob!!!!!!!! |
| 2009-02-03 | Andrea | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks I will try to reason with the supervisor and thanks for answering so fast! |
| 2009-01-31 | Atif | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks alot, I really appreciate it. Maybe getting it totaled won't be so bad. |
| 2009-01-30 | John | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Yeah, figured that would be the case, just happy I only had to pay the $300. Thank you. |
| 2009-01-24 | cathy | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | thankyou for your response, this will be very helpful, and now she knows where to begin |
| 2009-01-10 | Marcia | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Very thorough answer that is highly appreciated! |
| 2009-01-09 | Lin | 8 | 8 | 10 | 8 | Yes |
Answers by Expert:
Please remember. I am not an attorney and cannot legal advice. My answers are based on my experience due to litigation I have been involved in as an expert, for both insurance companies and while oposing them opposing them. I deal with only comprehensive claims on autos related to fire and theft. I have even had the opportunity to rewrite policy coverage language as it relates to vehicle theft and forced entry for insurance defense attorneys.
Experience in the area: Working with insurance companies and attorneys on these issues for over 20 years. It is very common to have a reported stolen car with a so-called factory anti-theft system to have the theft claim denied. I have served successfully as an expert witness in the courts across the US representing the insured and their attorney revealing that the insurance expert did not take all known theories into consideration before rendering their "Forensic" conclusion. Many insurance carriers us independent "Forensic" experts to examine reported stolen vehicles commonly using flawed methodology implicating the innocent insured with the theft. My job is to determine if the insurance expert reached his conclusions based on accepted scientific principals or just net opinion with no basis other than opinion. My case record against such experts is very compelling.My resume can be seen at the catagory "Auto Theft and Prevention." In "Forensics" the scientific method must be employed. In the forensic locksmith field determining how a reported stolen vehicle was last operated, many processes cannot be duplicated and are conveniently not addressed. If they were, juries would have the opportunity to make a fair and impartial opinion at least about what the expert could or could not prove. There is a purported process determining the last key used. The chances of determining such is very rare uless the key is found in the ignition lock. Experts commonly destroy evidence as well and are rarely questioned on this event. I reveal the weakness in their testimony on such instances.

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.