You are here:
K = Knowledgeability C = Clarity of Response T = Timeliness P = Politeness
N = Nominated for Expert of the Month
| Date | User | K | C | T | P | N | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-15 | Danny Lopes | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | |
| 2009-08-04 | darwin | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | My answer came quickly and now I understand something that had been bugging me.Thanks for your time. |
| 2009-07-25 | Jim | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thanks. That is what I thought the answer was, but I was not sure. |
| 2009-07-21 | WeiQiang | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | At first i think having this dream(to be a baseball player) is suck, but your answer give me hopes, thanks |
| 2009-07-18 | ken | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Not only do I get a great answer, I get history behind it! This is maybe my fifth question I've emailed (I've taken over the scorebook for my son's high school team in their summer season) and the service is just awesome. I think I'm going to start taking a note pad to games to write down questions I inevitably have just so I can utilize the service even more. Again, thank you. |
| 2009-07-10 | Trilby | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thank you so much. I thought as much but the coaches seemed to agree to disagree and it was let go.. and friendship game.. no big deal. ended up tie game 3-3, but always good to know what was what. P.S. Can I give an 11 for timliness??? 6 min? excellent!! |
| 2009-07-02 | Lorna J. Jaquiss | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | That's what I thought...Yet, Weds, July 1st., In the game Nationals against the Marlins, the Marlins took the lead on the 7th inning but couldn't finish the inning due to rain...They (The Marlins) were losing in the sixth...and yet they were awarded the "W" even though the inning was not completed... |
| 2009-06-27 | Jim | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | |
| 2009-06-21 | Brad | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks for your help. |
| 2009-06-13 | Mark | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-06-12 | Greg | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks I understand judgement calls are difficult and this helps me out a great deal |
| 2009-06-05 | Sheila Ballavance | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Very clear answer and very, very quick response. Thanks. I'll definitely use your service again if needed. |
| 2009-06-04 | David | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thanks so much for answering my question. Your response certainly rates a 10. What a fabulous service! |
| 2009-06-04 | John | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | |
| 2009-06-02 | Sean | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Quick, brief and to the point! Thanks so much. |
| 2009-05-31 | John | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | I appreciate your quick response and the answer was very helpful. |
| 2009-05-30 | Regina | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Brian help me a great deal, thank you so much for answering the question for me and my family so quickly. I am so glad I found this web sight, Thanks Brian for helping us out. |
| 2009-05-25 | Pat | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thank you! |
| 2009-05-23 | Regina Brooks | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thank you very much for your quick response. |
| 2009-05-21 | Jay | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thanks for the quick response and answer. |
| 2009-05-21 | Don Hand | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thanks I appreciate the response back and I will. |
| 2009-05-21 | Steve taylor | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Boy I thought I had a good argument. Thanx |
| 2009-05-15 | Stewart | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Quick reply, thanks! |
| 2009-05-02 | Lauren | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Thanks so much, we got the same answer elsewhere and we needed to confirm. We will be back with more questions. Have a great evening! |
| 2009-04-30 | Dean Brown | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thanks! |
| 2009-04-29 | Dan | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Perfect answer. Thanks |
| 2009-04-21 | John | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | Brian Flaspohler is very knowledgeable, and his responses are well written and comprehensive. He is a great "expert." Thanks. John |
| 2009-04-12 | Don | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | Thank you for your prompt response. |
| 2009-04-08 | ken | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yes | What a resource! Many, many thanks. Ken |
| 2009-04-08 | john | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | No | While the answer was timely knowledgeable and all, it does not make sense to penalize the batter on catcher's interference. To do right by the batter, there should be no time at bat charged to the batter. |
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next
Answers by Expert:
Questions about baseball rules, general information about the game, statistical analysis, questions about players, questions about Baseball records. I am a member of the Society for American Baseball Research (SABR) and a lifelong baseball fanatic. Don't ask me questions about training - this is not my area of expertise.
Lifelong fan, article about player movement from team to team throughout history.

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.